Hide and Seek

on Friday, February 29, 2008

I've already speculated that the Clintons seem to be hiding something when it comes to their finances. Well now Hillary has fanned the flame by publicly admitting that she won't release her tax returns to the public unless she becomes the nominee. See for yourself:

(Thanks: Allahpundit)

Question is, what has she got to hide? The cool $5 million she "loaned" to her camp? More miraculous cattle futures? Secret Soros money?

And the Clinton legacy of political cover-ups doesn't derail there. Remember 4 months ago when the Hillary camp hotly denied with a red face that they were preventing the release of White House documents and records from her hubby's term? Now this comes out:

ABC News' Rick Klein Reports: The White House on Wednesday blamed the Clintons for a month-long delay in the release of some 11,000 pages of records relating to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's years as first lady...

White House Press Secretary Dana Perino said that Clinton representatives have known since Jan. 31 that the documents -- Hillary Clinton's daily public schedule during her husband's presidency -- have been deemed ready for public release by the National Archives.

But under a November 2001 executive order, the White House can't make them available to the public until approval is given by a designated representative of former President Bill Clinton.

"Presently, we have not received notice that the Clinton representative has reached a decision on the release or withholding of any of Mrs. Clinton's schedules."
Meanwhile, Hillary continued in her lie when she said this on Tuesday:

"I've urged that the process be as quick as possible... and I have urged that our end of it move as expeditiously as we can."

The docs have been sitting there for 4 weeks awaiting nothing more than a signature from one of your husband's cronies. How is that moving as "quickly as possible"?!


on Thursday, February 28, 2008

The New York Times (you know, those idiots who give huge illegal advertising discounts to anti-Bush groups like MoveOn) are losing it. And no, I'm not talking about their minds - they never had those to begin with...

Late last week the NYT ran a total smear piece against John McCain that was so blatantly off the wall that 66% of Americans think that the story only had the insidious purpose of smearing the McCain camp. Even the executive editor of the Times himself admitted that the story was a massive failure.

So did the NYT learn anything from this rather embarrassing experience? Of course not! They decided to publish yet another bogus anti-McCain story:

The question has nagged at the parents of Americans born outside the continental United States for generations: Dare their children aspire to grow up and become president? In the case of Senator John McCain of Arizona, the issue is becoming more than a matter of parental daydreaming.

Mr. McCain’s likely nomination as the Republican candidate for president and the happenstance of his birth in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936 are reviving a musty debate that has surfaced periodically since the founders first set quill to parchment and declared that only a “natural-born citizen” can hold the nation’s highest office.
A musty debate?? Oh, you must be referring to the debate that was settled by our Founding Fathers almost 220 years ago when they signed the Naturalization Act of 1790 stating that "the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens".

It's sad that I have to do the NYT's homework for them. Keep in mind, those words penned over 200 years ago have not been contested since they were written, but that doesn't stop the NYT from running their second unfounded McCain smear piece in a week anyway.

Maybe that's why only 24% of Americans have a favorable opinion of you guys.

My only question is this: If you hippies over at NYT hate McCain so much, why did you formally endorse him in the first place?!

Nope, You're Not Lost...

politicsmeoff. new look. same political blasphemy.

Does She Even Know What 'Fiscal' Means?

on Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Since Hillary hasn't bowed out yet, we're still allowed to tug at her, right?

Oh well, I'm doin' it anyway.

At several recent rallies for the loser, Chelsea Clinton has touted her mom as being the "most fiscally conservative candidate running" in this election.

Now, the part that's horrifyingly disturbing in all of this is that her remarks were met with cheers and applause from the ever-shrinking Hillary army. The truth, however, couldn't be further from Chelsea's comment - a real shock coming from a Clinton, I know.

Truth is, Hillary actually made the top ten list in earmarks for last year and asked you and I, the taxpayers, for close to $350 million for special interest projects at home, including a $1 million Woodstock museum built to celebrate drugs, alcohol, immorality, promiscuity, and anarchy. Marvy.

Nice try, Chelsea. But next time, try looking up the words 'fiscally conservative' before publicly humiliating yourself. Again.

Al Gore Update

on Tuesday, February 26, 2008

As I type this, snowcover on several continents (including ours) is greater than it's been in 50 years and yet another study to debunk the global warming hoax is surfacing. I just love how this article starts:

Over the past year, anecdotal evidence for a cooling planet has exploded. China has its coldest winter in 100 years. Baghdad sees its first snow in all recorded history. North America has the most snowcover in 50 years, with places like Wisconsin the highest since record-keeping began. Record levels of Antarctic sea ice, record cold in Minnesota, Texas, Florida, Mexico, Australia, Iran, Greece, South Africa, Greenland, Argentina, Chile -- the list goes on and on.
The article continues...

All four major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA's GISS, UAH, RSS) have released updated data. All show that over the past year, global temperatures have dropped precipitously.

Meteorologist Anthony Watts compiled the results of all the sources. The total amount of cooling ranges from 0.65C up to 0.75C -- a value large enough to erase nearly all the global warming recorded over the past 100 years.
And if that's not enough sugar for your coffee, be sure to read the desperate comments from the global warming zealots still clinging on by their fingernails at the bottom of the article. These people are bordering insanity!

The Ultimate Backfire

on Monday, February 25, 2008

In Hollywood last night, after giving out awards for 80 years, the Oscars finally took home an award of its own: Least. Watched. Ever.

In fact, the ratings were so bad that Nielson's preliminary reports are showing that last night's ratings were 14 percent lower than the least-watched ceremony in history.

Now why is that?

Many of the nutroots on the left have hopelessly tried to argue that it was because of the writer's strike. Ahh, but let's not forget, the writer's strike didn't begin until November, and the movies released in 2007 were written long before the strike ever began, so it can't be that.

I think it's because this year's films were heavily pessimistic against our own country. I think it's because they were sharply political and showcased a blatantly obvious liberal bias. I think it's because this years' host was the liberal left's Bush-hating funny-man, Jon Stewart. I think it was the fact that the movies spotlighted would be those that trashed both our troops and our country.

Time to get a clue, Hollywood. Contrary to what you may think, most of us here actually like America. We like our freedoms. We enjoy our liberties. We appreciate our troops.

So is it a coincidence, then, that when you guys produce a bunch of stinky anti-American films, that you get your lowest ratings ever?

Thanks Congress

on Sunday, February 24, 2008

**Quick note about commenting on this blog: As always, comments are most welcome and I would like to thank those of you who spend the time to voice your opinions. Remember, this is a community blog, not a soap-box, so I hope you all continue to comment. For a while now, this blog's comments have been moderated by me to prevent the "you suck" and "I hate you" and "death to Bush" comments from being published until I give each comment the OK. But recently I've been getting spammed by bots from "naughty" websites so, for now, I've implemented comment word verification which will require you to retype the word that appears in the box above the comment. Since it requires a human to read the word, it prevents computer automated bots from spamming me with links to junk websites. So remember: make comments, be heard, and play nice.**

And with that, let's move on to our wonderful Legislative Branch.

This past Friday, the Bush Administration criticized Congress for their deliberate failure to pass a national security measure that would protect Americans from future terrorist attacks.

In a letter signed by both the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence, the administration stated:

[The] government has “lost intelligence” because of the expiration of surveillance legislation caught in a political tug of war.

“We have lost intelligence information this past week as a direct result of the uncertainty created by Congress’ failure to act...”
Did you catch that? Our own government has lost security intelligence beacuse our own Democratic controlled Congress has stubbornly refused to protect us.

Don't you see what this is? It's not about doing what's best for America anymore, it's about doing whatever they can to spite Bush, regardless of how dangerous it us for the rest of us. It's about disagreeing with Bush in every way possible. It's not about doing what's best for the country anymore - and it's not about doing what safest for you and I. People argue about how Bush has made this country a more dangerous place, but I don't ever hear these critics criticizing Congress for pulling stunts like this.

Meanwhile, our enemies are following our news carefully and are fully aware that at this current moment, while Congress is taking a vacation, they can plot against us on our own airwaves while we sit on our hands unable to listen.

Thanks Congress.

Advice to Barack: Tell Your Wife to Go Home

on Friday, February 22, 2008

Michelle Obama thinks that since her husband is "The Messiah" she and her husband get to play God with your Constitutional rights:

Michelle: Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism... Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.
Seriously, Michelle, what's your deal? Nowhere in the Constitution or Bill of Rights does it give the President (or his wife, for that matter) the power or authorization to demand anyone shed their cynicism or force themselves out of a usual, comfortable life.

But her mouth doesn't stop there. Remember how she isn't proud of her country? And how she's publicly refusing to show us her thesis on the black community? Well now she also thinks that every single woman in America is suffering beyond comprehension:

My life now is not really that much different from many of yours... Every woman that I know, regardless of race, education, income, background, political affiliation, is struggling to keep her head above water.
Every woman you know, Michelle?? How 'bout this one?

I'm sure your friend, Ms. Billionaire Winfrey is "struggling to keep her head above water". As well as your old Harvard professors, your snooty friends from your rich neighborhood, you mother, and every other woman you've ever met. What a tough life you all have.

My advice to Mr. Obama: Maybe it's time to bench your wife for a while. She's not helping your campaign. Maybe you could send her back to your $1.6 million dollar Chicago home where she can "struggle to keep her head above water" on your annual $1 million dollar salary.

UPDATE: Finally. Feeling pressure, the Obamas have released Michelle's thesis. I don't see why that was so hard...

Spoiler: Surprise, it's about racism! Who woulda thought...


on Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Hope for change. Change for hope. Hoping for hope. Changing for change. Hoping for change to change hope...

Is it just me, or do Barack Obama's speeches contain nothing of actual worth?.. His empty sermons contain the words "hope" and "change" every few seconds, but as a Senator, he's never really offered anything of actual substance to this country. Yet people are continuously fainting at his speeches as if he's some kind of healer.

(Before continuing, click here and also here for 2 relevant and rather humorous Obama "Hope-Change" ad parodies by Paul Shanklin)

Sure, the word 'hope' makes us all feel warm and fuzzy inside, but more often than naught, hope requires effort on our part. Obama does not put forth this effort.

In light of this fact, several media outlets have grilled Obama supporters to name just one accomplishment achieved by Obama. Watch the videos to see their idiotic responses:

And then MSNBC's Chris Matthews embarrassed Texas State Senator Kirk Watson when asking him if he could name one accomplishment from Obama:

(Spoiler: He couldn't)

So why all the pandemonium surrounding the Obama campaign? Do these people not read? I mean, he was just labeled as the most liberal Senator in America - more liberal even than Bernie Sanders, a socialist!! And here you can see video of Obama saying he wants to lose the war on terror and raise everybody's taxes - which is met with thunderous applause and cheers! These supporters are idiots!

Oh yea, his America-hating wife is also refusing to show us her college thesis, "Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community" until the day after the November election. Hmmm...

Open Mouth, Insert Foot

on Tuesday, February 19, 2008

With Hillary sucking vapors, it's time now for us to sink the ship of His Majesty, Barack Obama. It's a long-shot, I know. But remember kids, even the Titanic sank...

Probable future First Lady Michelle Obama shot her own husband in the foot yesterday when she said this: (here's the video)

For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country
Really Michelle? In the last 25 or so years you have not once had a single moment of pride for your country?? A country that has provided you with a life of wealth and prestige that most around the world can only dream of. A country that will send both you and your husband to Ivy League schools so you can have fancy careers. A country where your children can attend private schools in a wealthy, safe neighborhood. A country that has provided you with a life of financial success and prosperity. A country where you can worship as you choose. A country where you can go to the market and not fear that you'll be blown up because of your religion. A country who triumphantly stared terrorism right back in the face after the cowardly 9/11 attcks... All this, and yet only your husband's run for the White House has given you a sense of pride?!?! You should be ashamed of yourself, Michelle. Remember, if it sucks here so badly, Canada's just upstairs.

I suppose, though, that this shouldn't come as much of a surprise... After all, Barack doesn't feel patriotic enough to wear American flag pin lapels or to cover his heart and recite our own National Anthem - so why are we surprised to hear that the Obamas have hated America for the last quarter of a century??

Your Congress, Hard at Work

on Friday, February 15, 2008

There is a full-blown war in the Middle East, the economy is teetering, terrorists are trying to destroy our civilization, our gov't spending is out of control, and the stupid liberal Democrats want to block a bill that will help protect Americans from future terrorist attacks.

When reading that list it sounds like Congress has a lot to fix. So just what is it then that Congress has been up to this week?...

They've been grilling Roger Clemens about steroid use.

Wow. Apparently Nancy Pelosi's Congress has nothing better to do than question an MLB pitcher as to whether he used HGH or not. And since that made for such a tough week for Pelosi and cronies, they're now taking a 12-day recess. Don't work too hard, kids

...Meanwhile, our Democratic House wonders why we call them the "do-nothing-Congress"

Sign Here for Your Rebate Check, Stupid!

on Thursday, February 14, 2008

Yesterday, President Bush signed into law the economic stimulus package. Starting mid-May, $168 Billion will be dished out to families and businesses to help kick-start the economy.

The only problem is, we didn't have the $168 billion to give out in the first place! So where is this money coming from, you ask?...


Now most of us aren't going to complain if the gov't wants to give us a check for $600, but still one must ask, whose economy is really going to be the one benefiting from this brilliant plan? After all, we're already borrowing ourselves into oblivion with Chinese funds as it is, and now we're gonna borrow even more from the reds?! And then to make it even better, all of us will go turn around and spend that rebate money on goods... made in China

(Cue Mocking Applause)

So let's re-cap: We're borrowing money from China, to go out and buy goods made in China...

Whose economy is supposed to benefit from this again?

Buh Bye

on Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Hillary is defeated. And in many ways, it pleases me to no end. In fact, the only real bad news in this is that now we have to go up against the freight train they call "Obama."

After suffering a rather embarrassing defeat last evening in multiple states (as well as suffering defeats in roughly 20 out of the last 30 contests), Clinton has been lapped by Obama in the race for President. Unless the ol' lady takes a 30 point lead in every remaining state and unless Chelsea can wine and dine with all the other 795 super delegates, Hill is pwned.

So how does Hillary take this news?

Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has found a lot of ways to explain her string of losses to Sen. Barack Obama.

Caucus states, the former first lady says, are undemocratic and cater only to party activists. Southern states, like Louisiana, have "a very strong and very proud African-American electorate" naturally predisposed to favor a black candidate. And so-called "red" states like North Dakota, Idaho and Kansas — all of which Obama won on Super Tuesday — will never choose a Democrat in the general election anyway.
Nothing but weak justifications from a sore loser who can't admit defeat. Even the AP article itself reads:

The list of excuses is long, but the justifications are wearing thin

And it doesn't stop there. Hillary proves she can't admit defeat in the fact that she hasn't even congratulated Barack's victory for the second time in a row:

For the second election night in a row, Hillary Clinton failed to acknowledge or congratulate Barack Obama after he won the day in dominating fashion.

On Tuesday in El Paso, hours after Virginia had been called for Obama, she stuck to her “Texas campaign kickoff” message and did not stray from an energetic, Lone Star-themed stump speech. She did mention Obama by name, only to chide his health care plan.
Classy woman.

Closing advice to Barack Obama himself: Be careful. Hillary wants this nomination bad, and we all know what happens when someone gets in her way. I'm just sayin...

And to everybody else out there, don't give up hope! We're halfway there! Now we just need to stop the guy who wants to lose the war and raise your taxes.

Pimped Out Indeed

on Monday, February 11, 2008

MSNBC's David Shuster was recently suspended for a rather unfortunate comment in which he stated that the Clinton camp has "pimped out" Hillary's daughter, Chelsea, by having her place phone calls to celebrities and 'super delegates' throughout the country in an attempt to schmooze their vote.

In response to this, Clinton shrieked in terrifying outrage that she would never do another debate with MSNBC again.

Ah, but what's this, Chelsea spotted having breakfast with a 21-year-old super delegate??

Jason Rae is a typical junior in college.

He spends several hours a day in class at Marquette University in Wisconsin where he is majoring in history and political science. He is closely following the Marquette basketball team and has the Golden Eagles' schedule memorized.

But not many 21-year-olds start their Monday with a personal breakfast with Chelsea Clinton, as Rae did this morning at the student union at the nearby University of Milwaukee.

Rae got the one-on-one treatment from the former — and possibly future — first daughter because he is a Democratic National Committee member from Wisconsin and thus a "super delegate," one of the 796 free agents who can back any candidate in the race for the Democratic nomination.
Pimped out, indeed! This is what I like to call 'political prostitution'

But hey, I'm sure Chelsea's not trying to lead the poor sucker on just to get his vote. In fact, she probably really likes the guy! After all, who wouldn't think this guy is cute! I mean, just look at him!

Yes, I am being sarcastic

UPDATE: LOL. Turns out the kid's voting Team O anyway! I'm guessing there won't be a second date

Let's Iraq and Roll

on Sunday, February 10, 2008

I usually avoid Iraq on this blog as it has a tendency to attract 9/11 troofers. But I felt this may be worthy enough to spotlight:

The U.S. military has seized documents written by Al-Qaeda officials stating that Al-Qaeda is in shambles.

In the Anbar document, the author describes an Al Qaeda in crisis, with citizens growing weary of militants' presence and foreign fighters too eager to participate in suicide missions rather than continuing to fight, said Rear Adm. Gregory Smith, a U.S. military spokesman.

"We lost cities and afterward, villages... We find ourselves in a wasteland desert," Smith quoted the document as saying.

The memo — believed to have been written in summer 2007 — cites militants' increasing difficulty in moving around and transporting weapons and suicide belts because of better equipped Iraqi police and more watchful citizens, Smith said.

The diary, seized by U.S. troops south of Balad, was written in autumn 2007 by Abu Tariq, who refers to himself as sector leader for al-Qaida in Iraq, Smith said. Tariq wrote that he was once in charge of 600 fighters, but only 20 were left "after the tribes changed course" — a reference to how many Sunni tribesmen have switched sides to fight alongside the Americans, Smith said.
There it is. Words from the mouth of an Al-Qaeda official himself confirming that AQI is in total collapse. Regardless of whether or not you support the war in Iraq, this is good news for the security of ALL Americans.

It should also be noted that the very same day these documents were released, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi called the American troops' effort in Iraq a "failure."

It's also appropriate to note that the current leading contender for the White House, Barack Obama, recently called Iraq a "complete failure."

Time to question his agenda?


on Saturday, February 9, 2008

With the economy being Americans number one concern right now, I’m not so sure that Hillary Clinton is the best choice to repair it, especially when you look at how she has handled her own personal finances as of late:

Hillary's campaign has burnt all of it's cash and is all but bankrupt leaving Hillary the pleasure of personally "loaning" it (cue Dr. Evil voice) $5 millllllion dollars. Of course, when she uses the word loan, it means she intends on receiving that money back from campaign donations. So to any future Hillary campaign donors out there, your money is only going into her own purse. You are warned.

You know, come to think of it, where in the world did she get $5 mil in cash from? After all, her net worth is listed to be in the realm of $35 million - and most of that money is locked up in stocks and bonds. So are we to believe, then, that Hill would dump almost 15% of her entire net worth on 3-weeks-worth of TV ads?! Hardly. I, for one, believe there are other evil sources at play here. Like the satanic magic of the devil himself, Mr. George Soros - a man who has personally worked (and is still working) for the Clintons and could easily bail her out of her money-crunch with his estimated net worth of $7 Billion. And now she's refusing to show the public her income tax returns. Hmmm.

But it's not just Hillary who's destitute. Her own top aides are going without pay or health insurance. Regular American citizens are also getting stiffed by Clinton, the very same woman who has ironically vowed to help them succeed financially:

On Friday, the Herald reported that Dr. Terry Bennett of Rochester had not been paid $500 by the campaign after it rented space from him at 236 Union St., in Portsmouth for the five days leading up to the Jan. 8 New Hampshire primary. Bennett also said the campaign workers left the office in deplorable condition.
From the same article:

Iowa resident Richard Reese [said] he's still waiting to be paid for services his company rendered the Clinton campaign...

Reese provided [the] invoices, a listing of every day he was at the headquarters from November through January, and his bills. He said he has not seen one penny of the $7,561.70 he is owed.
Let's see... Clinton running her own campign into the ground, her own staff being forced to go without pay or medical coverage (which she insists EVERY American needs to have), and not paying those she owes money to...

Gee, sounds like the perfect candidate to help the economy...

UPDATE: Despite all the skepticism, Hillary has publicly announced that she, indeed,will not be releasing her tax returns

The Sky is Falling

on Friday, February 8, 2008

(Global warming protesters ironically getting pounded by snow in freezing temperatures)

The global warming nutroots are spinning like crazy as they try to convince us all that human-caused global warming still exists – even though the rest of us are digging out under record snow in record cold temperatures across the globe.

Avid readers of this blog will know that I have repeatedly showed that Al Gore’s back-of-the-napkin math simply doesn’t add up. He has continuously been debunked by well-respected geniuses like the Oregon Petition Project, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and NASA. But he still just doesn't seem to cave!

So what do un-relenting zealots do when they are backed into a corner?.. They get defensive, baby!

First they wanted to tax us to death, then they wanted to start issuing pointless carbon credits, then they wanted to phase out light bulbs, then people started sterilizing themselves cuz having children was destructive to the environment, then they started having abortions altogether to fight the cause… and now, because too many of us are starting to doubt global warming, they want to throw those of us who don’t believe in climate change in prison!

These people have lost… their… minds.

And if that's not enough, useful idiot-in-chief John Kerry blamed the recent destruction by tornados down South on global warming. Riiiight... Because tornados never happened before global warming, right Senator? He probably should've read Earth & Sky's article stating that "no scientific studies solidly relate climatic global temperature trends to tornadoes" before publicly making a fool of himself. Again.

Ah, but there is hope for humanity. Scores of Canadian scientists have conducted a large, well-funded study and are now stating that, get ready for this, the sun actually has more of an effect on global warming than many realize.

Huh, imagine that. The sun actually plays a role in the earth's temperature. Who would have thought?

Read the article. The scientists believe that the sun doesn't have a fever and is actually on a path towards cooling. Here's an excerpt:

Solar activity fluctuates in an 11-year cycle. But so far in this cycle, the sun has been disturbingly quiet. The lack of increased activity could signal the beginning of what is known as a Maunder Minimum, an event which occurs every couple of centuries and can last as long as a century.

Such an event occurred in the 17th century. The observation of sunspots showed extraordinarily low levels of magnetism on the sun, with little or no 11-year cycle.

This solar hibernation corresponded with a period of bitter cold that began around 1650 and lasted, with intermittent spikes of warming, until 1715. Frigid winters and cold summers during that period led to massive crop failures, famine and death in Northern Europe.
So how does Al Gore respond to this? He actually goes out and slaps hard scientific data in the face and cries that climate change is "significantly worse" than originally thought!

Folks, I'm telling you, this guy is hanging on by his fingernails.

Maybe the 400 prominent UN IPCC scientists who publicly announced that global warming is a hoax can convince him to end greenhouse gas emissions by shutting his mouth.

Exit question: How long until some activists call for a ban on the sun?

2008 Presidential Election: Democrat vs. Democrat

on Thursday, February 7, 2008

Take a look at one of the leading candidate's political positions:

  • Is a major crusader for the global warming fiasco
  • Voted against the Bush tax cuts multiple times
  • Supports higher taxes on ALL Americans, including the lower and middle classes
  • Supports and co-authored legislation that would mandate federal control of campaign financing which would restrict the free speech of every-day Americans (a direct violation of the First Amendment)
  • Has publicly scoffed and insulted the wealth of many successful Americans and has publicly bashed capitalism as a whole
  • Wants to implement a 50 cent increase per gallon on gasoline taxes
  • Drafted and co-authored a secret, back-doors amnesty bill that would grant citizenship to all illegal aliens. Then tried to sneak the bill into law without Americans knowing about it
  • Wants to block conservative judges from taking more posts
  • Has one of Mexico's most outspoken anti-border, pro illegal immigration activists serving as an advisor on their campaign for President
  • Is FOR amnesty to all illegal immigrants

  • What's the first name that comes to your head while reading this?.. Hillary? Obama?


    This is the record of one, John McCain... a man who claims to be a conservative, though his record proves he is nothing of the sort. And now he is the man who will, undoubtedly, be the "Repubican" nominee for President in November. McCain's name on the ballot this November will do nothing more than make the race for President be between 2 Democrats, with McCain being one of them.

    I may or may not go into detail at a later time to profile McCain's flawed record of pro-liberal, anti-conservative legislation. But suffice it to say, no matter who wins the general election this november:

    (Pic thanks to MM, Matt Aho)

    Here We Go Again...

    on Monday, February 4, 2008

    Deja Vu.

    Hillary has proved to us once again that robots can, indeed, cry. Last month, the day before the New Hampshire voters went to the polls, Hillary saw her support quickly diminishing and, in a conveniently calculated moment, cried (which I talked about here). As a result, she came back and stole the election because the female voters "felt her emotional energy, dude!"

    Well it worked before, so why not try again?

    Read this article from earlier today:
    NEW HAVEN, Conn. – Sen. Hillary Clinton teared up this morning at an event at the Yale Child Study Center, where she worked while in law school in the early 1970s.

    Penn Rhodeen, who was introducing Clinton, began to choke up, leading Clinton's eyes to fill with tears, which she wiped out of her left eye. At the time, Rhodeen was saying how proud he was that the sheepskin-coat, bell-bottom-wearing young woman he met in 1972 was now running for president.

    "Well, I said I would not tear up; already we're not exactly on the path," Clinton said with emotion after the introduction.

    Clinton [was] holding a roundtable discussion with Connecticut women to talk about childcare and healthcare.
    How unsurprisingly cynical. The day before an all-or-nothing election that can very well destroy her career we see ol' Hillary crying again in a false effort to steal back some of the female vote.

    The only two times Hillary has cried since her days in the White House have both been the night before a major election that pollsters say she is going to lose. Coincidence?? You do the math.

    Worst. Campaign. Ever.

    on Friday, February 1, 2008

    Just when you thought the Clintons couldn't get any stupider, Bill decides to blow us out of the water with his rather ingenious and brilliant solution to global warming:
    At a boring speech for his wife in Colorado Wednesday, Bill Clinton foolishly stated, "We just have to slow down our economy and cut back our greenhouse gas emissions 'cause we have to save the planet for our grandchildren."
    Riiiiight. Look, Bill, I don't wanna ask, but I just have to: Are you trying to sabotage your wife?

    In a time when the entire nation is breathing into a paper bag as stock market declines and the economy struggles to keep it's head above water, Bill Clinton proudly proclaims that we should actually slow down our economy in a pointless effort to fight off a phony scientific "theory" that still hasn't even been scientifically proven to exist. Now that's a great idea!

    And if that wasn't enough stupidity for one week, Hillary defiantly slapped the Constitution right in the face when she said this at the snoozefest debate last night:

    So Hillary opposes drivers licenses for illegal aliens because, if we issue them, they might get caught and deported.

    Oh, we don't want that now, do we... We would never want somebody to actually be punished for breaking the law.

    Folks, this is nothing more than pure demagoguery towards Hispanics. And by the way Hill, didn't you support giving drivers licenses to illegals just a few short months ago? Don't try to deny it. I have video.