Nobody Died When Clinton Lied... Oh, Wait, Yes They Did!

on Thursday, August 23, 2007

Many of us remember the 2006 interview that former President Clinton did with Chris Wallace. During the interview, Wallace questioned Bill whether or not his administration worked hard enough to capture/kill Bin Laden. In response, Clinton, red-faced and all, erupted and yelled while pointing his finger at Wallace, "What did I do? What did I do? I worked hard to try to kill him. I authorized a finding for the CIA to kill him. We contracted with people to kill him. I got closer to killing him than anybody has gotten since.”

Really?...

Well it just so happens that Michael Isikoff (one of the two men who first broke the Lewinsky story) has just uncovered more evidence of Clinton's pseudologia fantastica. Many assumed Bill was referring to a December 1999 Memorandum of Notification in which he authorized the capture (but not death of) Osama Bin Laden. The direct text from the inspector general's report states, "There was never any ambiguity (regarding Clinton's orders). “None of those authorities ever allowed us to kill anyone."

Interesting.

Except the difference between me and the leftist bloggers is that you will never hear me blaming Clinton for 9/11 (even though they love to pin 9/11 on Bush).

Democrats: I've Never Managed Anything! Vote Me into the Oval Office!!

on Monday, August 13, 2007

Sorry kids, I've been fairly ill for several days and haven't really been able to post anything... I'm all drugged up on Sudafed right now so the following post might not "flow" as well as other posts (if ya know what I mean), but here it is anyway:

Neither of the top two Democratic presidential hopefuls have never managed anything in an executive setting - ever!

Hillary - Has never managed a city, a state, a township, a payroll for a company, or even a taco stand during her life. She has argued that she gained tons of managerial experience during her husband's term in the White House... but if you ask me, flying around the world in Air Force One on an 8-year tax-funded vacation is hardly what I would call "managerial experience." The only thing she "managed" during her husband's term was a failed attempt to socialize medicine, which, by the way, was quite arguably the single biggest reason why the Republicans took over for the next 12 years!

Obama - Has also never run or managed anything since a journal during law school. He is easily one of the most inexperienced politicians to ever run for president (as his recent comments about Pakistan have shown) making him unfit to be the face of our foreign policy. His track record shows a severe lack of governance. He's also too spineless to even vote in any controversial senate bills as of late and also just informed us that his presence in upcoming debates will be "limited." The man is obviously a coward, yet he asks that you vote him into the oval office as commander-in-chief of a nation at war...


In contrast to the experience (or lack thereof) of the leading Democratic candidates, check the record of both Rudy and Romney - the top two Republican candidates:

Romney - One of the most successful businessmen this country has ever seen with a self-made net worth of $250 million. Served as CEO of Bain & Company, a management consulting firm, and is the co-founder of Bain Capital, an extremely successful private equity investment firm. Romney also served as the CEO of the 2002 Salt Lake Winter Olympic games and went on to save the 2002 Olympics from scandal and disaster. Despite the initial fiscal shortfall of $380 million below benchmark, the Games, under the leadership of Romney, ended up clearing a profit of $100 million. The man performs in any position in which he is placed. Romney later went on to win election as a Republican governor in Massachusetts - the bluest state in the Union. As governor he eliminated the deficit by 60%. He also balanced the state's budget and widened health coverage without raising taxes (which issue I shall address in a later post).

Rudy - Quite arguably "America's Mayor," who for nearly 8 years led a complex city whose population is greater than 40 out of the 50 states (can't say that for any of the Dems listed above). Crime and abortions drastically decreased during his tenure as mayor and Rudy is well known for "cleaning up" Times Square. Due to his level of involvement with 9/11, Rudy (who personally managed the 9/11 emergency response) now has direct experience in dealing with a global crisis. He also cut New York's crime rate by two-thirds and helped to restore New York's economy.


It's quite easy to see that the Dems are grossly unqualified in the field of executive management.

PS - The Hat Tip for this post goes to my brother, Thomas

Where's Al Gore Now?

on Friday, August 10, 2007

I know what you're thinking.. "Two posts in one day! What's the deal?" Well I'm trying to post more often so be sure to always scroll down whenever you check this blog in case you miss a post.

Anyway, I just got word on a nice precious jewel of information concerning all of the global warming shenanigans. I just had to pass it along to you all...

Al Gore and all the other nutroots who believe in human-caused global warming have argued that we have seen the world's hottest temperatures in the last decade. They claim that 9 out of the last 10 hottest years have occurred since 1995 - proof that human-caused global warming exists, right?

Wrong.

A NASA scientist has just discovered that a Y2K glitch skewed the temperature data. Just before the year 2000, a temperature sensor used by NASA was placed right next to two air conditioner units that supposedly threw off the data (the A/C units were blowing hot air directly at the sensor). Several scientists called for an investigation into the A/C 'scandal' and that's ultimately how the glitch was discovered.

Here's the graph of NASA's temperature data in which you can see the Y2K spike:


So it turns out that the warmest year on record is actually 1934, loooooong before King Gore began his crusade to stop all world citizens from ever driving a car or flicking a switch again! In fact, a third of the top 10 list of hottest years comes from the 1930s and 5 of the 10 warmest years on record now all occur before World War II. Also, 4 out of the last 7 years are below the year 1900 and don't even make the list of top 20 hottest years - further evidence that the world doesn't have a fever.

Ouch.

Now, is this the biggest discovery ever in the whole global warming fiasco?.. Hardly. But it sure ought to take the wind out of the sails of Al Gore's minions for a while.

On second thought, probably not...

More Hypocrisy from the Left

I can't help but smile every time someone tries to call Mitt Romney this election's leading flip-flopper regardless of the fact that you can count the number of times he has changed his candidatorial opinion on one hand, even if you have had a few fingers amputated.

In light of that, check out Hillary's latest daily mood swing:

As I already noted in a previous post, Hillary's opponent Barack Obama recently stated that it would be "a profound mistake" to ever use nuclear weapons in Afghanistan and Pakistan. His direct quote: "There's been no discussion of nuclear weapons. That's not on the table."

Hillary slammed Obama for his remarks and said that his comment shows that he is too inexperienced to be commander-in-chief. "I don't believe that any president should make any blanket statements with respect to the use or non-use of nuclear weapons," remarked Hillary.

But wait...

Just last year Hillary did an interview with Bloomberg in which she defiantly proclaimed almost in Obama's exact language, "I have said publicly no option should be off the table, but I would certainly take nuclear weapons off the table" and added regarding the discussion of nuclear weapons, "I think that's a terrible mistake."

That makes at least 3 flip-flops from Hillary this past week alone! The girl better take it easy before she pulls a muscle from all the gymnastics she's been doing.

Most Democrats Would Rather You Die than Say Something

on Wednesday, August 8, 2007

The Democratic Party is more worried about being politically correct than they are about you staying alive.

For instance, several months ago a store clerk at a Circuit City store was concerned when a group of men (who came to be known as the Fort Dix six) brought an 8mm tape to be converted to DVD format. The tape showed close to a dozen men shooting weapons and shouting the takbir, Allahu Akbar. When the clerk reported the suspicious information to the FBI, thousands of critics, mostly on the left, slammed the clerk stating that he was racist and "Islamophobic" and should have just kept his mouth shut. Our friends at CAIR condemned both the clerk, as well as the media, for linking the thwarted attack on Fort Dix with the Islam religion...

But wait a minute, weren't these men shouting Islamic prayers and referencing both Allah and phrases from the Qur'an? How is this not connected to Islam?

Other groups like the ACLU, the Muslim American Society, the American branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Sharpton, and scores in the Democratic Party have criticized and even threatened the clerk.

For what?!?! He saw a bunch of guys doing something suspicious and reported it... AND IT TURNS OUT THAT HE WAS RIGHT TO DO SO!!

In the same mode, last year the "Flying Imams" were arrested on suspicion of plotting a terror attack on an airplane. Before boarding, an Arabic-speaking female passenger heard the Imams repeatedly invoke “Bin Laden,” and “terrorism,” and then reportedly told the gate attendant that she (the Arabic-speaking woman) did not want to fly on that plane anymore. In addition, the men began chanting several Jihadist prayers and asked for suspicious items once boarding the plane (e.g. seatbelt extenders, regardless of the fact that these men didn't need them). The flight attendants also reported that the men refused to sit in their assigned seats, but rather in pairs at the front, middle, and back of the plane. Witnesses also state that several of the men only bought one-way tickets and checked no baggage. The Imams, who were kicked off the plane, have blatantly defied these allegations...

You know, I feel pretty safe to say that, regardless of whether or not you support Bush's terror policy, I think that all of us would be worried if we were sitting on an airplane with all that going on.

But no-ooo-ooo... Instead, the same groups listed above, as well as the NAACP, publicly support the "John Doe" lawsuit in which the Imams are suing some of the passengers for "discrimination." In fact, CAIR is even helping to provide the Imams with legal council.

After months of deliberation, Representative Steve Pearce (a Republican, mind you) introduced a bill that ultimately was written into a homeland security bill that would protect citizens like you and I from being sued after reporting suspicious behavior.

So who voted against the bill that would protect you and I? Check out the 'NAY' votes from the Senate roll call vote on the John Doe amendment:

Count 'em: 39 Democrats ALL voting in favor of terrorist plotting, instead of protecting you and I. Notice, not one Republican voted in favor of groups like the Fort Dix six or the Flying Imams - only Democrats.

Nice to know the Dems are looking out for you, isn't it?

Jobs Americans Won't Do...as Badly as Illegal Immigrants, that is

on Tuesday, August 7, 2007

An interesting bit of light has been shed on the bridge collapse this past week. Normally I try diligently to avoid fueling the media's facination with always trying to pin the blame on somebody whenever tragedy strikes, but this info is just too good to pass up:

So just who is building our bridges?...

Answer: Tarrasco Steel

You may ask, "So what does that have to do with anything?" Well it just so happens that the owner of this company has been arrested and charged with hiring illegal immigrants on bridge projects that they (Tarrasco) have done in several states. At least 26 illegal immigrants have been arrested for providing fake social security numbers to Tarrasco. Several of these men had either improper, false, or no welding certifications at all!

So a warm thank you goes out to all those who support illegal immigration! Your "bi-partisan, open-borders policy" has endagered - and even taken - the lives of many Americans.

Look at this, I'm gone for one week and everything falls apart...

on Friday, August 3, 2007

Have you ever had that experience where you walk into a messy room and there is so much to clean and organize that you literally just don’t know where to even start?.. That’s how I feel. So much has happened in the 2 weeks that I haven’t been able to post that I don’t even know how to address it all, but I’ll try my best to highlight the lowlights:


1) The Fringe festival in Britain is about to debut a musical entitled, "Jihad: The Musical," which will feature songs like "I wanna be like Osama" and is acclaimed as "a madcap gallop through the wacky world of international terrorism."

…I'm speechless…

One group is calling it a "tasteless portrayal of terrorism"… Right, as opposed to a tasteful portrayal of terrorism. Idiots…

Here is the link to watch the Osama song. Why all of a sudden are there flashbacks of "Springtime for Hitler" running through my head?

If I may add one more thought on this, there IS a point where these so-called 'artists' can no longer do absolutely anything they want while hiding behind their veil of claiming "but it's art!" even though they produce offensive and even violent works of art, this play for instance. To illustrate this point, here is a disgusting comic from some moonbat artist published in the late 60s:


2) On a similar note Capcom is about to release Nintendo Wii’s version of Zack & Wiki. It’s been known for a long time that the media is notorious for spewing leftist propoganda, but now they are using video games a method to influence your children, the largest playing audience of this game I might add. This game, for instance, includes Islamic propaganda and contains references to Islamic religion and even the Islamic prayer "Allahu Akbar."


3) Presidential hopeful Barack Obama warned that if he is elected president, he would order US forces to hit extremist targets on Pakistan’s frontier with Afghanistan if embattled military ruler President Pervez Musharraf failed to act.

Oh yea, that’ll work.

He later added, “I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance,” then said, with a pause, “involving civilians.” He then quickly added, “Let me scratch that. There’s been no discussion of nuclear weapons. That’s not on the table.”

Oops.

So let me get this straight: Obama wants us to surrender and pull out of Iraq, then invade Pakistan, then surrender there too. Sounds like Obama has just had his ‘jump the shark’ moment.


4) I just have to throw something in here about Hillary. Just this past week Hillary Clinton became the official puppet of both Kos and MoveOn and deserves the gold medal for demagogue of the century.

Hilary’s weekly flip-flop: “We must not act unilaterally in Pakistan — wait, Barack said what? Okay, then we should


5) Mahir Sherif, attorney for Nuradin Abdi (who just barely pleaded guilty in Ohio to plotting a terror attack on a shopping mall), says his client only admitted guilt because the ignorant infidel jury would not have grasped the subtle nuances of his plan to commit mass murder. He said, “A fair trial here would not be possible because Americans “have no or limited understanding” of why Muslims are angry.

In other words, you and I are too dumb to understand the “higher calling” of those who in their own self-righteousness like to blow other people up.


6) Libya has released the 6 Bulgarian medics convicted of infecting Libyan children with HIV. (Libya has also confessed to torturing the medics.) Just by sheer coincidence, Bulgaria has waived $57 million of debt owed to it by Libya. They call it bookkeeping, I call it ransom. Look, I love Bulgaria (after all, I did live there for 2 years), but their government is full of a bunch of spineless pansies making it one of the weakest governments in the world.


7) John Edwards, crowned king of the nutroots, criticized Democratic rival Hillary Clinton for taking more than $20,000 in donations from News Corp. officials, arguing that the company’s Fox News Channel has a right-wing bias and Democrats should avoid the company. Edwards demanded that all Democratic candidates return any campaign donations from Rupert Murdoch and News Corp.

That’s funny… Mr. Edwards, I believe that you yourself earned at least $800,000 for a book published by one of the media mogul’s companies. I hear that in addition to a $500,000 advance from HarperCollins, which is owned by News Corp., you also were cut a check for $300,000 for expenses… And of this money you have only returned $1,000.

Demagoguery at its finest.